Back to overview

On Having Evidence: A Reply to Neta

Type of publication Peer-reviewed
Publikationsform Original article (peer-reviewed)
Author Logins Arturs, Logins Arturs,
Project Justification, Lotteries, and Permissibility
Show all

Original article (peer-reviewed)

Journal Logos {&} Episteme
Volume (Issue) 6(3)
Page(s) 367 - 370
Title of proceedings Logos {&} Episteme
DOI 10.5840/logos-episteme20156327


According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.