Publication
Back to overview
Show all
Original article (peer-reviewed)
Journal
|
Studia philosophica
|
Volume (Issue)
|
72
|
Title of proceedings
|
Studia philosophica
|
Open Access
Abstract
The debate on the anthropological difference concerns the question of
how to understand the difference between human beings and (other) animals. On
the one hand, assimilationists maintain that human beings differ from other
animals in the same way as different kinds of animals differ -- namely, by
being merely quantitatively and gradually different. On the other hand,
differentialists maintain that human beings not only possess capacities that
animals lack, but that (at least some of) these capacities differ
qualitatively. According to them, the qualitative difference constitutes two
logical realms which human beings and animals separately inhabite.\par
This paper tries to defend a differentialist position concerning the
anthropolocial difference. It first shows why differentialists need not be
conftronted with the Problem of Interaction and then outlines how a
differentialistis' account of the anthropolocial difference could look like.
-