Data and Documentation
Open Data Policy
FAQ
EN
DE
FR
Suchbegriff
Advanced search
Publication
Back to overview
Measurement of team knowledge in the field – Methodological advantages and limitations
Type of publication
Peer-reviewed
Publikationsform
Contribution to book (peer-reviewed)
Author
Ellwart T. Rack O. & Biemann T. (2011),
Project
Wissenstransfer bei altersheterogener Zusammenarbeit: Erfolgsfaktoren und Gestaltungsansätze
Show all
Contribution to book (peer-reviewed)
Book
Coordination in Human and Primate Groups
Editor
, M. Boos M. Kolbe P. Kappeler & T. Ellwart
Publisher
Springer, Heidelberg
Page(s)
155 - 176
ISBN
978-3-642-15354-9
Title of proceedings
Coordination in Human and Primate Groups
Abstract
Team knowledge is seen as an important element in the understanding of coordination processes in teams. Congruent with the taxonomy of coordination mechanisms (cf. Chaps. 2 and 7), the construct of team knowledge refers to shared team-level knowledge structures facilitating implicit processes such as tacit behaviours as well as coordination success. This chapter answers three major questions: (1)What are the challenges of measuring teamknowledge in organizational settings compared to more controlled laboratory settings? (2)What concepts of team knowledge exist in the psychological literature, and how are they related to coordination processes? (3) What methods can be applied to measure team knowledge in the field? Although there are several approaches to identifying and measuring team knowledge in a laboratory setting, applications in an organizational context are rare. Thus, this chapter discusses three types of team knowledge: team mental models, team situation models, and transactive memory systems. The advantages and limitations of techniques for capturing team knowledge are discussed and current directions are introduced.
-