Back to overview

Adaptive selection of diurnal minimum variation: a statistical strategy to obtain representative atmospheric CO2 data and its application to European elevated mountain stations

Type of publication Peer-reviewed
Publikationsform Original article (peer-reviewed)
Author Yuan Ye, Ries Ludwig, Petermeier Hannes, Steinbacher Martin, Gómez-Peláez Angel J., Leuenberger Markus C., Schumacher Marcus, Trickl Thomas, Couret Cedric, Meinhardt Frank, Menzel Annette,
Project ICOS-CH Phase 2
Show all

Original article (peer-reviewed)

Journal Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Volume (Issue) 11(3)
Page(s) 1501 - 1514
Title of proceedings Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
DOI 10.5194/amt-11-1501-2018

Open Access

Type of Open Access Publisher (Gold Open Access)


Abstract. Critical data selection is essential for determining representative baseline levels of atmospheric trace gases even at remote measurement sites. Different data selection techniques have been used around the world, which could potentially lead to reduced compatibility when comparing data from different stations. This paper presents a novel statistical data selection method named adaptive diurnal minimum variation selection (ADVS) based on CO 2 diurnal patterns typically occurring at elevated mountain stations. Its capability and applicability were studied on records of atmospheric CO 2 observations at six Global Atmosphere Watch stations in Europe, namely, Zugspitze-Schneefernerhaus (Germany), Sonnblick (Austria), Jungfraujoch (Switzerland), Izaña (Spain), Schauinsland (Germany), and Hohenpeissenberg (Germany). Three other frequently applied statistical data selection methods were included for comparison. Among the studied methods, our ADVS method resulted in a lower fraction of data selected as a baseline with lower maxima during winter and higher minima during summer in the selected data. The measured time series were analyzed for long-term trends and seasonality by a seasonal-trend decomposition technique. In contrast to unselected data, mean annual growth rates of all selected datasets were not significantly different among the sites, except for the data recorded at Schauinsland. However, clear differences were found in the annual amplitudes as well as the seasonal time structure. Based on a pairwise analysis of correlations between stations on the seasonal-trend decomposed components by statistical data selection, we conclude that the baseline identified by the ADVS method is a better representation of lower free tropospheric (LFT) conditions than baselines identified by the other methods.