Back to overview

Which Attitudes for the Fitting Attitude Analysis of Value?

Type of publication Peer-reviewed
Publikationsform Original article (peer-reviewed)
Author Deonna Julien A., Teroni Fabrice,
Project Knowledge, Action, and Factive Mental States
Show all

Original article (peer-reviewed)

Journal Theoria
Page(s) theo.12333 - theo.12333
Title of proceedings Theoria
DOI 10.1111/theo.12333

Open Access

Type of Open Access Publisher (Gold Open Access)


According to the Fitting Attitude (FA) analysis of value concepts, to conceive of an object as having a given value is to conceive of it as being such that a certain evaluative attitude taken towards it would be fitting. Among the challenges that this analysis has to face, two are especially pressing. The first is a psychological challenge: the FA analysis must call upon attitudes that shed light on our value concepts while not presupposing the mastery of these concepts. The second challenge is normative: the FA analysis must account for the fittingness of the relevant attitudes in terms of a kind of normativity intimately related to these attitudes, but again without presupposing the mastery of the relevant value concepts. In this article, we show that real progress is possible if we pay close attention to the nature of the attitudes recruited by the analysis. More specifically, we claim that an FA analysis that appeals to emotions conceived as evaluative attitudes – as opposed to, for instance, evaluative judgements or evaluative perceptions – has the best prospects of meeting the two challenges and of putting the FA analysis on a strong footing.