policy narrative framework; child and adult protection services (KESB); discourse analysis; Institutional reform ; framing; public accountability; street-level bureaucrats; policy practice
Stauffer Bettina, Kuenzler Johanna (2021), Introduction—Stories of the old world: The Narrative Policy Framework in the European context, in
European Policy Analysis, 7(S2), 268-275.
StaufferBettina, KuenzlerJohanna (2021), Stories of the old world: The Narrative Policy Framework in the European context (special issue), in
European Policy Analysis (EPA), 7(S2), 268.
Kuenzler Johanna (2021), From zero to villain: Applying narrative analysis in research on organizational reputation, in
European Policy Analysis, epa2.1123-epa2.1123.
Hildbrand Leandra, Stauffer Bettina, Sager Fritz, Kuenzler Johanna (2020), Erzählungen des Kindes‐ und Erwachsenenschutzes: Eine Anwendung und Erweiterung des Narrative Policy Frameworks, in
Swiss Political Science Review, 26(2), 181-205.
Author |
Kuenzler, Johanna; Stauffer, Bettina |
Persistent Identifier (PID) |
https://doi.org/10.23662/FORS-DS-1271-1 |
Repository |
FORS
|
Abstract |
In Switzerland, the KESB authorities decide about welfare service delivery as well as about the taking of coercive measures. The authorities were created in 2013, following a change to the Swiss Civil Code (ZGB) adopted by the Swiss Parliament. Whereas most of the French-speaking cantons were able to continue working within the existing system, the changes to the Civil Code led to organizational changes in the German-speaking cantons and the Ticino.Our analysis will begin in the 1990s, when the first meetings on the reform of the guardianship system, as child and adult protection services were referred to back then, took place. We will then track the reform on the national level as well as its implementation on the cantonal level at the turn of the millennium. This will be followed by an analysis of the debate in the media and its implications for today.
The reformed child and adult protection services (KESB) in Switzerland are being heavily criticised. Opponents accuse them of despotism and incapability - hardly the qualities sought after for an authority operating at the border of state activity and fundamental rights. Yet, experts claim that the new system works effectively and achieves its goals satisfactorily. In our proposed research project for NRP 76, we want to analyse this puzzle by employing multiple theories and research methods of political science. For this purpose, we focus on three research questions: 1) How did the institutional reform of the Swiss child and adult protection services emerge? 2) How did the moral controversy evolve around the KESB and to what extent does this debate differ in the language regions of Switzerland? 3) What are the consequences of this public controversy for policy practice and how does it affect actual policy implementation by the KESB, even in the absence of formal substantive rule changes? By answering these questions, we want to generate knowledge not only for the scientific community but also for the stakeholder groups of NRP 76 - especially for the KESB themselves and other authorities who might become the target of public accusations.