Climate modeling; Convection; Large-eddy simulation; Turbulence closure; Turbulence ; Clouds ; Subgrid-scale parameterization
Tan Zhihong, Schneider Tapio, Teixeira João, Pressel Kyle G. (2017), Large-eddy simulation of subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers: 2. Cloud response to climate change, in
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9(1), 19-38.
Pressel Kyle G., Mishra Siddhartha, Schneider Tapio, Kaul Colleen M., Tan Zhihong (2017), Numerics and subgrid-scale modeling in large eddy simulations of stratocumulus clouds, in
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9(2), 1342-1365.
Brient Florent, Schneider Tapio (2016), Constraints on Climate Sensitivity from Space-Based Measurements of Low-Cloud Reflection, in
Journal of Climate, 29(16), 5821-5835.
Ait-Chaalal Farid, Schneider Tapio, Meyer Bettina, Marston J. B. (2016), Cumulant expansions for atmospheric flows, in
New Journal of Physics, 18, 025019.
Tan Zhihong, Schneider Tapio, Teixeira Joao, Pressel Kyle G. (2016), Large-eddy simulation of subtropical cloud-topped boundary layers: 1. A forcing framework with closed surface energy balance, in
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 8(4), 1565-1585.
Byrne Michael P., Schneider Tapio (2016), Narrowing of the ITCZ in a warming climate: Physical mechanisms, in
Geophysical Research Letters, 43(21), 11350-11357.
Adam Ori, Schneider Tapio, Brient Florent, Bischoff Tobias (2016), Relation of the double-ITCZ bias to the atmospheric energy budget in climate models, in
Geophysical Research Letters, 43(14), 7670-7677.
Pressel Kyle G., Kaul Colleen M., Schneider Tapio, Tan Zhihong, Mishra Siddhartha (2015), Large-eddy simulation in an anelastic framework with closed water and entropy balances, in
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 7(3), 1425-1456.
The largest contributor to uncertainties in climate change projections are clouds and particularly low clouds. If low cloud cover increases as the climate warms, the increased planetary albedo implies a mitigating feedback on climate changes; if low cloud cover decreases as the climate warms, the reduced albedo implies an amplifying feedback. Existing theories and models do not agree on the sign or magnitude of low cloud cover changes as the climate warms. Representing low clouds in climate models is difficult primarily because the turbulent dynamics governing them have scales of meters, while the resolution of climate models typically is of order hundred kilometers. Thus, cloud-scale turbulent dynamics must be represented parametrically in terms of the resolved large-scale dynamics of climate models. Approaches to do so generally represent second-order turbulent fluxes in terms of first-order quantities, often using second-order equations to estimate closure parameters that arise in the flux closures. For example, when turbulent fluxes are represented as diffusion down mean gradients, diffusivities are often estimated with the help of a (second-order) turbulent kinetic energy equation. But the second-order equations typically are local in space, disregarding non-local spatial correlations that we know to be important, for example, in convective plumes.Now is the time for fundamental progress on the problem of representing cloud-scale turbulent dynamics in climate models, for three reasons. (1) We are in a golden age of Earth observations, with space-based measurements that give us unprecedentedly detailed data. (2) Large-eddy simulations (LES) have become reliable enough to faithfully simulate cloud-scale turbulent dynamics (modulo microphysical processes such as raindrop formation). (3) High-performance computing (HPC) has reached the critical point at which we can conduct statistically steady LES of cloud-scale dynamics in domains the size of a typical climate model grid box. The research we propose will leverage these three advances to develop new and unified representations of turbulence in clouds and boundary layers, with the long-term goal to reduce uncertainties about cloud feedbacks in climate change projections. We are proposing a three-pronged approach: (1) We will develop a new LES code and validate it with observational data. (2) We will then use LES with representations of large-scale dynamics to obtain statistically steady states of clouds and boundary layers. We will vary the climate and region represented systematically, to study physical mechanisms of how clouds are maintained and respond to climate changes. (3) We will develop new and unified closures of the turbulent dynamics of clouds and boundary layers for large-scale climate models, using LES to test them systematically. First, the development of closures will focus on eddy diffusion/mass flux approaches, which hold promise for unified representations of all subgrid-scale turbulence in climate models, from boundary layers to deep convection. Then, we will use more sophisticated approaches in which the closure of turbulent dynamics is achieved at second order and non-local spatial correlations are retained explicitly. This obviates the need, for example, to specify entrainment rates---which are uncertain and contribute to uncertainties about the cloud response to climate changes. Such approaches have the promise to deliver more accurate closures, with reduced needs to specify arbitrary closure parameters, at the expense of increased computational cost, which, however, can be borne with today's HPC platforms.This research will be directed by Professor Tapio Schneider and will involve one PhD student and a postdoctoral fellow with extensive experience in high-performance computational fluid dynamics.