A. Lichtenberger, C. Wagner, S. Hofer, E. Stern, A. Vaterlaus (2017), Validation and structural analysis of the kinematics concept test, in
Phys. Rev. PER , 13(1), 010115.
C. Wagner, A. Lichtenberger, A. Vaterlaus (2016), Effect of peeer discussions, as part of formative assessment, on learning of Physics concepts, in
Science Education Research: Engaging Learners for a Sustainable Future (Proceedings of ESERA 2015), ESERA 2015, Helsinki.
C. Wagner, A. Lichtenberger, A. Vaterlaus (2015), Kinematics concepts at different representation levels – a mutual information approach, in
Proceedings of the GIREP MPTL Conference 2014, PalermoGirep Proceedings, Palermo.
C. Wagner, A. Vaterlaus (2014), A Model of Concept Learning in Physics, in Sidharth Burra G. (ed.), Springer, Heidelberg, 589-593.
A. Lichtenberger, A. Vaterlaus, C. Wagner (2013), Analysis of student concept knowledge in kinematics, in
Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference, Nicosia, CyprusESERA eBook, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Formative assessment is among the most promising tools to improve learning at school. Within the proposed project we intend to introduce and evaluate elements of formative assessment to Swiss Gymnasiums (which we will also call high schools hereafter). Due to its broad definition formative assessment has to be developed and adapted for every school level and teaching situation. Within the proposed project we want to apply the peer instruction implementation process defined by Lasry et al. (Lasry N, Mazur E, Watkins J: Peer Instruction: From Harvard to the Two-Year college, Am. J. Phys. 76: 1066 - 1069, 2008) to the teaching of physics at Swiss high schools.Concepts in physics can often be counterintuitive on first sight so that students have to unlearn misconceptions and to learn new concepts at the same time. In order to bring students to actively think about the concepts of physics and to make their thoughts visible we plan to introduce two new elements to the high school teaching of physics. Concept questions used to engage effective peer as well as class room discussions represent the first element. These questions will be used in the setting described by Lasry (2008) and will be posed by using an electronic response system. The second element represents the application of diagnostic tools to evaluate students understanding of concepts. This instrument reveals the gap between student learning and learning goals on an individual basis. It also discloses teaching deficits and advises teachers where lessons have to be improved. The in class use of a diagnostic test is followed by a reflective lesson during which individual knowledge deficits can be cured. Concept questions and diagnostic tool are assisted by a monitoring instrument which helps students to evaluate their individual progress.We will develop and evaluate concept questions and diagnostic tools for teaching a basic mechanics course of 9 weeks. The learning outcome of classes taught with these instruments will then be compared to a control group in which conventional teaching is practiced. Although formative assessment focuses on peer instructions, self-assessment, classroom discussions and so on it will also increase the frequency of testing. Therefore we are going to compare the learning outcome of the formative assessment group not only with the traditional teaching group but also with a third group using frequent testing. Students from this group solve the same set of problems as the formative assessment group in a test setting rather than a formative activity setting.The project is based on an interdisciplinary collaboration between representatives from Physics, Physics Education, and Educational Psychology. It is planned to gauge students’ intelligence in order to find out whether the number of underachievers will decrease in classes with teachers practicing the described elements of formative assessment. Effects on changes in learning motivation and interest in physics will be investigated, too. Moreover, we intend to find out to what extent the training in practicing formative assessment will change teachers’ beliefs on learning physics. Therefore, their pedagogical content knowledge will be gauged by a well-tried questionnaire. In addition to investigating achievement growth as an effect of the planned intervention in a pre-post control group design, the study allows microgenetic longitudinal analyses on the process of conceptual change.