Project

Back to overview

Transforming Memories of Collective Violence in the Hebrew Bible

Applicant Ammann Sonja
Number 181219
Funding scheme Eccellenza grant
Research institution Theologische Fakultät Universität Basel
Institution of higher education University of Basel - BS
Main discipline Religious studies, Theology
Start/End 01.01.2019 - 31.12.2023
Approved amount 1'462'035.00
Show all

Keywords (7)

Trauma Studies; Esther; Hebrew Bible; Historical Criticism; Maccabees; Violence; Joshua

Lay Summary (German)

Lead
Das Alte Testament erzählt von einer Vergangenheit, in der Israeliten sowohl Opfer als auch Täter von Gewalt werden. Durch diese imaginierte Gewaltgeschichte werden erlittene Gewalterfahrungen bewältigt und das eigene Gewaltpotential reflektiert.
Lay summary
Das Alte Testament enthält viele Erzählungen über Krieg und Gewalt. Die gegenwärtige Bibelwissenschaft erklärt das als literarische Reaktion auf erlittene Gewalt, die die Menschen im antiken Israel von wechselnden Grossmächten erfahren haben. Das Forschungsprojekt nimmt diesen Ansatz auf, geht aber darüber hinaus und nimmt auch solche Erzählungen in den Blick, in denen Gewalt ausgeübt wird. Die alttestamentlichen Texte werden dabei nicht als historische Berichte verstanden, sondern als kollektive, identitätsstiftende Erinnerungen interpretiert, in denen Machtlosigkeit und glorreiche Vergangenheit ineinander verschränkt sind. Das Projekt untersucht die literargeschichtliche Entwicklung von alttestamentlichen Erzählungen und fragt, wie eine Gruppe durch eine imaginierte Gewaltgeschichte das eigene Gewaltpotential reguliert und Erfahrungen von Gewalt bewältigt.

Das Projekt verbindet historische und philologische Methoden der Bibelwissenschaft mit einer breiteren sozialgeschichtlichen Perspektive und nimmt Ansätze aus der Traumaforschung auf. Am Beispiel alttestamentlicher Literatur werden Argumentationsstrukturen, Selbst- und Feindbilder und Bewältigungsstrategien in Bezug auf erlittene und ausgeübte Gewalt aufgezeigt. Die Ergebnisse können für die Erforschung gegenwärtiger Diskurse des Siegens und Besiegtwerdens herangezogen werden. Das Projekt leistet damit einen Beitrag zur interdisziplinären Trauma- und Konfliktforschung.
Direct link to Lay Summary Last update: 05.12.2018

Responsible applicant and co-applicants

Employees

Abstract

Violence in biblical texts is often disturbing to the modern reader. To counter this ethical indignation, current biblical scholarship has pointed out that biblical texts often emerged in reaction to experiences of collective violence and were written from the perspective of the vanquished. Moreover, narratives of past violence - such as narratives of the conquest of Canaan or the book of Esther - are recognized as ideological fiction rather than reliable historical accounts. A growing consensus in biblical scholarship holds that the biblical texts were written mainly after the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem. The fictional narratives of violence can thus be explained as “counterpresent” memory, stemming from a time when the producers of these texts were in no actual position of power. But as we can see in biblical texts like the books of Maccabees, the counter-historical construction of memory might also go the other way round, producing victimological rather than triumphalist narratives. Comparative evidence from ancient Near Eastern and Greek historical narratives confirms the existence of such patterns. In this project, we will argue that biblical memories of vanquishing and being vanquished are intertwined and need to be studied together as interrelated aspects of the cultural memory of collective violence. In recent years, biblical scholars have increasingly used literary and cultural trauma theories to describe the relationship between experiences of collective violence and their reflection in biblical texts. Building on insights from recent trauma research within and beyond biblical studies, we will explore the cultural function of biblical narratives of collective violence as part of Israel’s cultural memory in post-monarchic times. We will draw on V. Volkan’s concepts of “chosen trauma” and “chosen glory” as a tool for analysing texts produced by a group that has experienced collective violence and that, through imaginary literature, copes with the violent potential within the group.This project will begin with four Work Packages (WPs), each focusing on one specific area of biblical narratives which led to the commemoration of a “trauma” or “glory” in the later history of reception: the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem (WP A: 2 Kgs 24-25; 2 Chr 36; Jer 37-43; Jer 52; 1 Esdras 1); the conquest of the land of Canaan in the book of Joshua (WP B: Josh 6-11); the religious persecution and subsequent triumph of the Maccabees (WP C: 1-2 Macc); and the collective violence at the end of the book of Esther (WP D: Esth 8-9). We will analyse the Hebrew and Greek witnesses to these texts, combining narratological tools with redaction criticism in order to reconstruct the development of the violent narratives in their historical contexts. In a final stage (WP E), the research team will work together to develop an integrated view on how ancient Israel coped with collective violence - including its own violent potential - through the literary construction of an imagined history of violence.The project will test the following working hypotheses: 1) memories of vanquishing and of being vanquished are interrelated in biblical narratives of collective violence; 2) biblical narratives of collective violence evolve in relation to historical changes and, as part of shared cultural memory, contribute to identity formation or the legitimation of power in different historical contexts; 3) biblical narratives of collective violence are a means of coping both with violence experienced and with the group’s own violent potential.We anticipate that the results of this project will a) provide new and historically-grounded interpretations of difficult biblical texts, b) provide insights into strategies of coping with experiences of collective violence and with a group’s own violent potential, and c) reassess and contribute to contemporary trauma studies.
-