Project
Back to overview
Evaluation of Impacts and Challenges arising from Current Regulatory and Reporting Reforms
English title |
Evaluation of Impacts and Challenges arising from Current Regulatory and Reporting Reforms |
Applicant |
Wagner Joël
|
Number |
137781 |
Funding scheme |
Project funding (Div. I-III)
|
Research institution |
Institut für Versicherungswirtschaft Universität St. Gallen
|
Institution of higher education |
University of St.Gallen - SG |
Main discipline |
Science of management |
Start/End |
01.11.2011 - 30.04.2013 |
Approved amount |
79'326.00 |
Show all
Keywords (3)
reporting; insurance; regulation
Lay Summary (English)
Lead
|
|
Lay summary
|
In the European insurance industry, regulatory and reporting frameworks are currently subject to farreaching reforms. The Swiss Solvency Test, a new solvency requirement in Switzerland, is already in force. The new European solvency framework, Solvency II, will presumably be implemented by end 2012 (European Union, 2009). On the part of reporting, the Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV) Principles (CFO Forum, 2009b) were published in June 2008 and are expected to be implemented from 31 December 2011 on. An exposure draft on IFRS 4 Phase II, a new reporting standard defining how to recognize, measure, and disclose insurance contracts, was published in July 2010 (IASB, 2010a). Finally, in a White Paper on insurance guaranty systems, the European Commission (2010) proposes that a directive should be introduced which ensures that all Member States of the European Union have an insurance guaranty system in place that meets certain minimum requirements. We analyze these regulatory frameworks in the details, put them into relation to each other, analyze costs and benefits, and estimate their economic impact. To achieve this, we plan to write, present, and publish two papers related to these new regulatory frameworks. Both papers extend existing literature and have essential practical implications for insurers, regulators, as well as investors. Paper 1 takes a broad view and compares new regulatory and reporting frameworks. Different takeholders’ perspectives are analyzed in order to assess the economic impact of the regulatory concepts. The paper has a special emphasis on the relation between the different frameworks which is of particular relevance due to various interrelations and interactions. Paper 2 builds on paper 1 and aims at estimating the actual costs (direct and indirect) of each single new regulatory and reporting framework. This will help insurance companies to prepare for the introduction of these concepts. Given the substantial scale of the new regulatory and reporting frameworks, this research project is of high relevance to insurers, regulatory, investors, and policyholders. |
|
Responsible applicant and co-applicants
Employees
Publications
Wagner Joël, Zemp Alexandra (2012), Comparison of Stakeholder Perspectives on Current Regulatory and Reporting Reforms, in
Risk Management and Insurance Review, 15(2), 225-254.
Lorson Jonas, Schmeiser Hato, Wagner Joël, Evaluation of Benefits and Costs of Insurance Regulation - A Conceptual Model for Solvency II, in
Journal of Insurance Regulation, 0.
Kreutzer Markus, Wagner Joël, New Solvency Regulation: What CEOs of Insurance Companies Think, in
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 0.
Braun Alexander, Müller Katja, Schmeiser Hato, What Drives Insurers' Demand for Cat Bond Investments? Evidence from a Pan-European Survey, in
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 0.
Scientific events
Active participation
Title |
Type of contribution |
Title of article or contribution |
Date |
Place |
Persons involved |
Western Risk and Insurance Association, Annual Meeting (WRIA)
|
|
|
02.01.2013
|
Las Vegas
|
|
39th Seminar of the European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists (EGRIE)
|
|
|
17.09.2012
|
Palma
|
|
16th International Congress on Insurance: Mathematics and Economics (IME)
|
|
|
28.06.2012
|
Hong Kong
|
|
Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance (MAF) 2012
|
|
|
01.04.2012
|
Venice
|
|
Jahrestagung des Deutschen Vereins für Versicherungswissenschaft (DVfVW)
|
|
|
21.03.2012
|
Hannover
|
|
Doktorandenseminar 2012
|
|
|
20.01.2012
|
Nürnberg
|
|
Western Risk and Insurance Association, Annual Meeting (WRIA)
|
|
|
04.01.2012
|
Kona
|
|
Associated projects
Number |
Title |
Start |
Funding scheme |
144549
|
Implicit Constraints, Incentives, and Systemic Risk Imposed by New Standards for Insurance Regulation |
01.01.2013 |
Project funding (Div. I-III) |
129901
|
Regulation in the Financial Services Industry After the Crisis (D-A-CH/LAV) |
01.04.2010 |
Project funding (Div. I-III) |
Abstract
In the European insurance industry, regulatory and reporting frameworks are currently subject to farreaching reforms. The Swiss Solvency Test, a new solvency requirement in Switzerland, is already in force. The new European solvency framework, Solvency II, will presumably be implemented by end 2012 (European Union, 2009). On the part of reporting, the Market Consistent Embedded Value (MCEV) Principles (CFO Forum, 2009b) were published in June 2008 and are expected to be implemented from 31 December 2011 on. An exposure draft on IFRS 4 Phase II, a new reporting standard defining how to recognize, measure, and disclose insurance contracts, was published in July 2010 (IASB, 2010a). Finally, in a White Paper on insurance guaranty systems, the European Commission (2010) proposes that a directive should be introduced which ensures that all Member States of the European Union have an insurance guaranty system in place that meets certain minimum requirements.We want to analyze these regulatory frameworks in the details, put them into relation to each other, analyze costs and benefits, and estimate their economic impact. To achieve this, we plan to write, present, and publish two papers related to these new regulatory frameworks. Both papers extend existing literature and have essential practical implications for insurers, regulators, as well as investors. Paper 1 takes a broad view and compares new regulatory and reporting frameworks. Different takeholders’ perspectives are analyzed in order to assess the economic impact of the regulatory concepts. The paper has a special emphasis on the relation between the different frameworks which is of particular relevance due to various interrelations and interactions. Paper 2 builds on paper 1 and aims at estimating the actual costs (direct and indirect) of each single new regulatory and reporting framework. This will help insurance companiesto prepare for the introduction of these concepts.Given the substantial scale of the new regulatory and reporting frameworks, this research project is of high relevance to insurers, regulatory, investors, and policyholders.
-